Built by people who've been paged at 2am
because of an ungoverned automation.

Flowcerta started as an internal tool. We were working on an automation center of excellence with hundreds of UiPath workflows in production and no reliable way to answer a simple question: which of these workflows is safe to promote?

Manual review didn't scale. Every developer had different standards. Hardcoded credentials, missing error handlers, fragile selectors, and undocumented changes all looked fine until they caused an incident. By then, the audit trail was incomplete and the remediation process was slower than the failure itself.

We built Flowcerta to make that question answerable in minutes, for every workflow, every time, without depending on institutional knowledge or a spreadsheet that drifted out of date the moment a release got busy.

What we believe

• Governance should be automated, not a checklist someone fills out under pressure.
• Every workflow that touches production data deserves a risk review, not just the obvious ones.
• The best time to catch a hardcoded credential is before it reaches production.
• Compliance evidence should be a byproduct of normal development, not a fire drill before an audit.

What we're building

We're building the governance layer that automation teams do not know they need until they have already needed it once. Static analysis, health scoring, collaborative review, validation history, and workflow-level remediation guidance belong in the same operating surface.

Today that means UiPath, Power Automate, Automation Anywhere, and Blue Prism coverage. Over time it means a broader automation control plane that helps teams prove what changed, who approved it, and whether a workflow is actually fit for production.

We're a small team. We ship fast. We talk to users constantly. If you're running an automation program and want to share what breaks down in governance tooling or what your team has built to fill the gap, we want to hear from you.